Legal Opinion

W. Pat Crow Forgings, Inc. v. Casarez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1988No. 2-87-100-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURDOCK, Justice.

Appellants, W. Pat Crow Forgings (Pat Crow Forgings) and Les Cathey, bring this appeal from a judgment by the 236th District Court in which the appellants were held to be in breach of an employment contract. In four points of error, the appellants assert that the court below was in error because the appellee was terminable at will.

We affirm.

Appellee had been employed at Pat Crow Forgings since 1954. In August 1981, ap-pellee held the position of hammer operator. As a hammer operator, appellee was a member of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Local 96, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Reynolds Manufacturing Co. v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. West Texas Utilities Company v. IrvinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. City of Dallas v. Moreau, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  5. Watson v. Zep Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Winograd v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API