Legal Opinion

Martin v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1986No. 01355PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This case is before us on appeal from entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant/appellee. The sole issue for our determination is whether the trial court erred in finding that appellants’ claims under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act1 (hereinafter the Act) were barred by the statute of limitations contained in the Act. We find that the trial court erred in finding the claims barred, and we therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Appellants Freddie Watkins and Russell Martin, on March 17, 1978, were passengers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Myers v. USAA Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Zubris v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims PlanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Warren v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Bragg v. State Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API