Legal Opinion
Zubris v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1983No. 639PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
This is an appeal from an Order dated March 3, 1981, dismissing a complaint in assumpsit for no-fault benefits provided under the provisions of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (hereinafter the “No-Fault Act”) and the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan. Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176, 40 P.S. § 1009.101 et seq. Appellee’s request for a summary judgment was granted on the grounds that the complaint was filed beyond the two-year statute of limitations provided in the No-Fault Act.
Appellant, Mark Zubris, was injured on January 13, 1976, while a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- O'Neill v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Bond v. GallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Donnelly v. DeBourkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Legman v. Scranton School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Express Co. v. BurgisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Maginley v. Robert J. Elliott, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Capanna v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Mangum v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned ClaimsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Goll v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.