Legal Opinion

Emmert v. Hill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 5, 1922No. Gen. No. 7,031PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jokes

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Stephenson county directing J. Manley Clark, conservator of the appellee, Mary Emmert, to file in the office of the county clerk of said county a written renunciation of the benefits of all devises dr other provisions in her favor contained in the last will and testament of her deceased husband, Joseph Emmert, and allowing appellee solicitors’ fees. It is conceded by appellants that a -court of equity has the power, in a proper case, to renounce the provisions of a will made by a husband in favor of his insane widow. The real question in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Steenwyck v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Carper v. CrowlIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Blatchford v. NewberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. In re Estate of ConnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. First Natl. Bk. of St. Petersburg v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Kinnett v. HoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. First National Exchange Bank v. HughsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  5. Wentworth v. WaldronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API