Legal Opinion

Wentworth v. Waldron

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The master ruled, in substance, that the allegations of the plaintiff’s bill did not state a case for equitable relief. In considering the propriety of this ruling it is logically necessary to give attention first to the assertion made by the defendant in his answer that the superior court is “without authority” to nullify his waiver of the provisions of the will of John N. Haines or to issue the injunction prayed for. This position is untenable. A guardian is a fiduciary whose conduct is subject to regulation by a court of equity in cases where the remedy at law is inadequate. Sparhawk v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BassettMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. First Natl. Bk. of St. Petersburg v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. In re Estate of ConnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Dolbeare v. BowserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. In re Estate of StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Hanford v. ClancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Turner v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Spencer v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. In Re ThaxterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API