Legal Opinion

Phebus v. Dunford, Judge

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1948No. 7187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

This mandamus proceeding arises out of the action taken by the trial court ostensibly pursuant to our decision in the case of N. J. Meagher, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Uintah Gas Co. (Valley Fuel Supply Co., Defendants, and Ray Phebus, Ashley Valley Oil Co., and Joe T. Juhan, Defendants and Appellants), 112 Utah 149, 185 P. 2d 747, 754. In that appeal this court directed:

“The decision of the lower court is reversed, and the case remanded to that court for proceedings to conform to this opinion. Costs to appellant.”

For a foundation for that direction we merely invite attention…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larsen v. GasbergUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Meagher v. Uintah Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Warren v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Madsen v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shilts v. YoungAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Meagher v. Equity Oil CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. DeFunis v. OdegaardWashington Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API