Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Madsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1931No. 5112PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKINNEY, District Judge.

On the former appeal in this case (72 Utah, 96, 269 P. 132, 135) this court entered the following order and judgment:

“Prom what has been said, it follows that the judgment will have to be set aside and the case remanded to the trial court with directions to sustain the special demurrer to the first, second, and third causes of action upon the ground that they constitute but an attempt to split the one cause of action which respondent has stated by his complaint; that respondent be permitted to amend his complaint if he so desires. Such is the order; appellant to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blatchford v. NewberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Krantz v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Woods v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  5. Madsen v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harper v. Tri-State Motors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Phebus v. Dunford, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API