Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, J. *
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Provide Commerce, Inc. (Provide), appeals from an order denying its petition to compel arbitration of certain consumer fraud claims brought by plaintiff Brett Long (Plaintiff) on behalf of himself and a putative class of California consumers who purchased flower arrangements through Provide’s Web site, ProFlowers.com. Provide sought to compel arbitration based on a provision contained in the company’s “Terms of Use,” which were viewable via a hyperlink displayed at the bottom of each page on the ProFlowers.com Web site.
The Terms of Use on ProFlowers.com…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Windsor Mills, Inc. v. Collins & Aikman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Daniel Berman v. Freedom Financial Network LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Charissa Keebaugh v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Soliman v. Subway Franchisee Advert. Fund Tr., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Godun v. Justanswer LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.