Legal Opinion
Crickenberger v. Town of Westfield
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 7, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions
On certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This writ brings up an ordinance of the town of Westfield for the laying of a stone sidewalk.
Westfield is an incorporated town under the General Town act, approved March 7th, 1895. Gen. Stat., p. 3525.
*468The ordinance is attacked upon the ground that it was not passed “by the unanimous vote of all the members of tire council,” as required by a supplement to the Town act, approved March 28th, 1904. Pamph. L., p. 263.
The act of 1904 is an amendment to a supplement to the General Town act, which said supplement was approved March 31st, 1897. Pamph. L,, p. 144. Under tire supplement of 1897, and its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Green v. WellerMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
- Southworth v. Palmyra & Jackson RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
- Atkins v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hopkins v. MacCullochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Coxon v. Inhabitants of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Gumm v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Tidewater Southern Ry. Co. v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Croaff v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.