Croaff v. Evans
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment entered by the Yavapai County Superior Court refusing to hold an amendment to the zoning ordinances of Yavapai County invalid. Plaintiff-appellant urges that the amendment was invalidly enacted because:
1. A quorum of the Board of Supervisors did not officially participate in the statutorily required public hearing on the proposed amendment prior to its enactment; and,
2. Although twenty percent of the property owners allegedly filed protests to the proposed change, the amendment did not receive a “unanimous vote of all members of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Nebraska Environmental Control CouncilNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mobile Community Council for Progress, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- ROCKAWAY SHOPRITE v. LindenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- David Welch v. Cochise Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 2021