Legal Opinion

Croaff v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 10, 1981No. 1 CA-CIV 4669PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment entered by the Yavapai County Superior Court refusing to hold an amendment to the zoning ordinances of Yavapai County invalid. Plaintiff-appellant urges that the amendment was invalidly enacted because:

1. A quorum of the Board of Supervisors did not officially participate in the statutorily required public hearing on the proposed amendment prior to its enactment; and,

2. Although twenty percent of the property owners allegedly filed protests to the proposed change, the amendment did not receive a “unanimous vote of all members of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Nebraska Environmental Control CouncilNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Mobile Community Council for Progress, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. ROCKAWAY SHOPRITE v. LindenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  4. David Welch v. Cochise Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API