Tidewater Southern Ry. Co. v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Secretary of State of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Arthur L. Levinsky, J. G. De Forest, and Heller, Powers & Ehrman, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Mandamus. The petitioner, a railroad corporation, institutes an original proceeding in this court to compel the secretary of state to file in his office a certified copy of a certificate of creation of bonded indebtedness by petitioner. The facts are undisputed, the only return to the alternative writ heretofore issued being in the form of a demurrer for want of facts. The respondent urges but one ground in support of his refusal to file the certificate, and it is conceded that, unless this ground be well taken, the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought.
The proceedings for creating a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green v. WellerMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Missouri · 1836
- McLane v. Placerville & Sacramento Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Southworth v. Palmyra & Jackson RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
- Warnock v. City of LafayetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Hopkins v. MacCullochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1997
- Lateef v. City of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1992