B & R BUILDERS v. Beilgard
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Chief Justice.
Appellants Dave Rosenbaum (Rosenbaum) and B & R Builders appeal the district court’s judgment after bench trial concerning partnership property and partnership accounting.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
ISSUES
Rosenbaum presents these issues:
I. The District Court erred when it ignored the clear and unambiguous language contained in the contract documents and relied on extrinsic evidence and parol evidence rather than enforcing the writings contained in the contract documents.
II. The District Court erred in its accounting by allowing Appellees credit for an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- P & M CATTLE CO. v. HollerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Rolfe v. VarleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Zwemer v. Production Credit Ass'n of MidlandsWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Harestad v. WeitzelOregon Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Whitney Holding Corp. v. TerryWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Nathan R. Baker and Bryner Farms, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. David Speaks and Elizabeth SpeaksWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- State, Department of Family Services v. PAJWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Warnick v. WarnickWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.