Legal Opinion

Warnick v. Warnick

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2003No. 02-131, 02-155PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] A general partner in a family ranch business sued the partnership and the other two partners on various contract, quasi-contract and partnership theories, seeking recovery of his partnership interest. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court granted Plaintiff's motion, found that dissociation and buyout of the Plaintiff was the appropriate remedy and entered judgment in the amount of $230,819.14 for his share of the ranch's value. Defendants appealed; Plaintiff cross-appealed the caleulation of his partnership share. Finding that the district court erred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. GRANITE BEACH HOLDINGS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Brennan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Robertson v. Jacobs Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Gob, LLC v. Rainbow Canyon, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Shoemaker v. ShoemakerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. John M. Zupan, Jr. v. Heather M. ZupanWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API