Rolfe v. Varley
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
Harley and Pauline Rolfe, husband and wife, appeal from a judgment, awarding Jay Varley approximately $900,000.00, an equitable lien on all of the Rolfes’ real estate holdings, and terminating the alleged partnership between the Rolfes and Varley. Underlying this controversy is a written document, signed by the parties, which was to formalize their agreement to develop a resort hotel facility in Jackson, Wyoming; but instead the agreement created a tangled web of rights and duties. After a four-day bench trial, the district court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Reynolds v. TiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Furman v. Rural Electric Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Samuel v. ZwerinWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- B & R BUILDERS v. BeilgardWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Baker v. Ayres & Baker Pole & Post, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Jessen v. JessenWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.