Legal Opinion

Monaghan v. Jordan's Meats

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 31, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] In this workers’ compensation appeal, we are asked to revisit the “work search rule” and to decide whether, pursuant to that rule, evidence that the injured employee made unsuccessful job inquiries at 147 potential employers compels a determination that work is unavailable to her in her local community, thereby requiring an award of 100% partial incapacity benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Jerome, HO), finding Monaghan’s work search to be insufficient, awarded only partial benefits. We review the state of the law regarding the work search rule, and, in light of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Bolduc v. Pioneer Plastics Corp. &/Or American Mutual LiabilitySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Bowen v. Maplewood Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. Pelchat v. Portland Box Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Graves v. Brockway-Smith Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Jensen v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. Tucker v. ASSOCIATED GROCERS OF MAINE, INC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Avramovic v. R.C. Moore Transportation, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. Tucker v. ASSOCIATED GROCERS OF MAINE, INC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API