MATTER OF BELSKY v. New York City Transit Auth.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Following a hearing conducted by a duly appointed designee, respondent, upon review, sustained various charges of misconduct and discharged petitioner from his high supervisory position. On this appeal, petitioner does not claim that the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Nor does he assert that the sanction imposed is shocking to one’s sense of fairness in light of the gravity of the sustained charges. Rather, he maintains that he was vested with a due process right to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson v. WolanskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mildner v. GulottaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
- Levin v. GulottaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Girard v. City of Glens FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ortiz v. LesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Ost v. SupervisorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Breu v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995