Legal Opinion

Bonds v. Third District Court

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2007No. Nos. 20060293, 20060294PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

BACKGROUND

T1 On March 5, 2005, Aaron and Morey Bonds and Bail, as Surety, posted a bond for Gustavo Samaniego. When Samaniego failed to appear for his court date, the court clerk sent a timely notice of nonappearance to the Surety. The notice did not contain the fax number of the prosecutor, which the Surety argues is required by Utah Code section 77-20b-101(1)(b).

T2 The Surety moved for relief from any further obligation under the bond, in accordance with Utah Code section 77-20b-101(8), and the district court denied the Surety's motion. The court held that the "technical…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BarrettUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Springville Citizens for a Better Community v. City of SpringvilleUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wheeler v. McPhersonUtah Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. KunzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. Halversen v. Allstate Property and CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Salt Lake City Corporation v. HaikCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Gladwell v. ReinhartUtah Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API