Wilson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLAN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the summary denial of a Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp., petition.
In his petition, the appellant raises the following grounds for relief: (1) that the indictment was insufficient to support the charge of robbery; (2) that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made; and (3) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.
The State moved for dismissal of the petition on the grounds that it constituted a successive petition within the meaning of Rule 20.2 A.R.Crim.P.Temp. More particularly, the State argues that the issues raised by the appellant,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Marzettie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Bill Salter Advertising, Inc. v. City of BrewtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992