Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1991No. CR 90-127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the summary denial of a Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp., petition.

In his petition, the appellant raises the following grounds for relief: (1) that the indictment was insufficient to support the charge of robbery; (2) that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made; and (3) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

The State moved for dismissal of the petition on the grounds that it constituted a successive petition within the meaning of Rule 20.2 A.R.Crim.P.Temp. More particularly, the State argues that the issues raised by the appellant,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Marzettie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Bill Salter Advertising, Inc. v. City of BrewtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API