Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1992No. CR-90-127Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

This cause was remanded to the trial court to adjudicate two of the claims raised by the appellant in his Rule 20, A.R.Cr. P.Temp., petition: the insufficiency of the indictment claim and the ineffective assistance of counsel claim. 582 So.2d 588.

On return to remand, the trial court found that the appellant’s indictment was not ambiguous and that he was adequately informed of the crime with which he was charged. The trial court further found that the failure of the appellant’s trial counsel to challenge the indictment did not amount to ineffectiveness of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API