Fitzhugh v. City of Bay
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Bay; Maxwell, J. Bill by Cornelia G. Fitzhugh against the city of Bay-City and the Auditor General of the State of Michigan,, to restrain the collection of a paving assessment. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
This bill is filed by complainant, who-resides at Groveland, N. Y., for the purpose of setting, aside an assessment upon her lands in Bay City for paving what is known as “Twelfth Street.” Ten reasons are given why the tax is void and should be-set aside. On the hearing in the court below, the tax, which was to be paid in three installments, was upheld, except a reduction in the first installment to be paid. Complainant appeals.
*582We think it unimportant to discuss the objections raised as to the legality of this tax. It appears that in April, 1893, the common council of Bay City adopted a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Byram v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Lundbom v. City of ManisteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Goodwillie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farr v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Jones v. GableMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Nowlen v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Auditor General v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Attwood Brass Works v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.