Legal Opinion

Goodwillie v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Donovan, J.) Bill to enjoin the collection of a paving assessment. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, 0. J.

The bill in this case is filed to enjoin the collection of a paving assessment. The case was heard on bill and answer. It is alleged that the proceedings are invalid—

“1. Because the board of public works never furnished the common council with the detailed estimate of cost of pavement required by the charter.
“2. Because the laying of water and gas pipes in the portion of the street paved was not completed a full year before the pavement was ordered, as the charter requires, but, on the contrary, the city laid the water main in the street immediately before the laying of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Byram v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Jones v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Butler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Mills v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Cuming v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Atwell v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Moore v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Campbell v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Geib v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API