One Way Fare v. Department of Consumer Protection
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant, the department of consumer-protection, which found the plaintiffs in violation of General Statutes § 30-86 for the sale or delivery of alcohol to a minor. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that (1) they failed to establish an entrapment defense and (2) the defendant’s determination that they violated § 30-86 was supported by substantial evidence on the record. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the court.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-CotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- United States v. Joseph D. Harris A/K/A Sonny Joe Harris (92-1455) Alton Kilbourn (92-1457)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WilderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011