Legal Opinion
State v. Wilder
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 17, 2011No. AC 31369PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant, Kenneth Wilder, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of attempt to possess crack cocaine in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (1) and 21a-279 (a) and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use in violation of General Statutes § 21a-267 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly failed to instruct the jury on the defense of entrapment and (2) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of possession of drug…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Daniel G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. Daniel G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. ProsperConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- State v. WilderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011