Legal Opinion

Troth v. Warfield

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 20, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01106Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DAVID TROTH and JARI TROTH, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:19-CV-1106-JD-MGG ) SETH WARFIELD, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER In 2017, David Troth was interested in retiring from his job. David and his wife Jari approached Seth Warfield, seeking guidance on retirement plans. The Troths followed Mr. Warfield’s advice and Mr. Troth retired in late 2017. Upon receiving his first benefits check, the Troths discovered Mr. Warfield’s advice was faulty and Mr. Troth was now receiving significantly less…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API