Legal Opinion

Meloy v. Nashville Trust Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This suit was brought by complainant as next friend of a minor, Phil J. Tinsley, against his guardian, the defendant Trust Company, for an accounting and a recovery of an alleged loss of the ward’s funds incurred by the guardian in making an unauthorized and unlawful mortgage loan investment of $12,500. The cause was heard, on the pleadings and stipulations and the bill dismissed by the chancellor, who found that the investment was not within the authorized class for a ward’s funds when made, but that by the Act of 1931, Chapter 100, the law was changed so as to make investments made in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Hindman v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Freeman v. Citizens' Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hutson v. JensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grahl v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hail v. Nashville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Lebanon Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Freeman v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Blackburn v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API