Smart v. Heirs of Luiki

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PADGETT, J.

This is an appeal from an amended final judgment in a quiet title action. Appellant raises two contentions; One is that he should have been adjudicated the sole owner of the premises in question because of his claim of constructive adverse possession. We disagree and affirm the holding that he had not established title by adverse possession to the whole interest in the premises.

*35Appellant’s second contention is that in determining the respective interests owned in the premises by himself and appellees, the court below erred in taking judicial notice of certain…