Legal Opinion
McAulton v. Smart
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1973No. 5232PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MARUMOTO, J.
Plaintiff Abraham Kualaku McAulton brought this action in the third circuit court against Richard Smart to obtain a partition of a parcel of land at Anaehoomalu Bay, South Kohala, Hawaii, and an accounting by defendant of the profits attributable to the interest in the parcel claimed by him. The parcel in question was originally awarded to Queen Kalama, wife of King Kamehameha III, and is covered by and described in Land Commission Award 4452, Royal Patent 7523, issued to her.
In the complaint, plaintiff alleged that he is the sole surviving descendant of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
- Cane City Builders, Inc. v. City BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Robinson v. McWayneHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Stein v. United Artists Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Myers v. CohenHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- Loose v. BrubacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- In Re the Determination & Declaration of the Heirs of KeamoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.