Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Casiano

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 15, 2007No. 06-P-1503PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.

In the circumstances of this case, we hold that the act of pointing of a cellular telephone camera at a witness waiting to testify in a criminal proceeding constitutes intimidation. We thus affirm the conviction of the defendant.

Background. A jury in the Dorchester Division of the Boston Municipal Court Department convicted the defendant, David Casiano, of intimidation of a witness in violation of G. L. c. 268, § 13B.1 He appeals, claiming that the trial judge erred *706by (1) not granting his motion for a required finding of not guilty; (2) misapplying G. L. c. 233, § 79J, and denying his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. ClaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. MerolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. PopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. PerezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Hrycenko v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. FortunaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API