Legal Opinion
Keenan v. Marker
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2001No. 01-1113PublishedCited by 338 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Timothy Keenan, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This ease has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking declaratory and monetary relief, Keenan alleges in his complaint that he was deprived of personal property by the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) personnel after the property was placed in storage pending…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Abdias 836389 v. MacauleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
- Adam Wesley Coleman v. ATC Healthcare et al.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2026
- Adams 462766 v. MacauleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
- Adams 823706 v. HarjuDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.