Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Economus v. Coakley
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Return on a writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The defendant makes return to the writ that he holds the above-named Nicholas Economus under and by virtue of a warrant issued by the clerk of the City Court of Utica for the arrest of the said Nicholas Economus, in that the said Nicholas Economus is guilty of the crime of wrongfully and feloniously violating ordinance 383 of the year 1919 of the city of Utica, a misdemeanor, in that, on or about the 4th day of January, 1920, the relator conducted a public place of business for profit, a pool and billiard parlor, at 167 Genesee street, Utica, N. Y., without filing a surety bond and obtaining…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Carthage v. . FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Matter of Stubbe v. . AdamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Duryee v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Thompson v. . SchermerhornNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- City of Brooklyn v. . BreslinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schacht v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Lees v. Cohoes Motor Car Co.New York Supreme Court · 1924
- Rizzo v. DouglasNew York Supreme Court · 1923