Goff v. Richards
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
In the instant motor tort case, the trial judge, upon motion, granted a directed verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee at the conclusion of the opening statement by counsel for the plaintiff-appellant.
On appeal to this Court, appellant poses four questions for our review. Because we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for a new trial on the ground that the trial judge is without authority in this State to grant a motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of an opening statement, it is unnecessary for us to consider appellant’s other three contentions.
The only…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McLhinney v. Lansdell Corp. of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Bessie C. Lampka v. Wilson Line of Washington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Hartman v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Raitt v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Lust v. KolbeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- State v. DesperttCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Richards v. GoffCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975