Legal Opinion

Goff v. Richards

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 26, 1973No. 135, September Term, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

In the instant motor tort case, the trial judge, upon motion, granted a directed verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee at the conclusion of the opening statement by counsel for the plaintiff-appellant.

On appeal to this Court, appellant poses four questions for our review. Because we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for a new trial on the ground that the trial judge is without authority in this State to grant a motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of an opening statement, it is unnecessary for us to consider appellant’s other three contentions.

The only…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. McLhinney v. Lansdell Corp. of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Bessie C. Lampka v. Wilson Line of Washington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. Hartman v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Raitt v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Lust v. KolbeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. State v. DesperttCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Richards v. GoffCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API