Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Meadows

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 21, 1966No. [No. 312, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, C. J.

The losing plaintiff in a motor tort case tried before a jury brings this appeal. His counsel, with great verve and vigor, denounce many alleged errors in the trial below, but, when analysed, the record fails to show that some of these alleged errors are presented by the record. In fact, the record discloses little more than a disputed question of fact, which was properly submitted to the jury for its decision.

As we view the case, the appeal can be decided by answering without undue elaboration, these simple questions: (1) should plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schowgurow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Schiller v. LefkowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Lloyd v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wingfield v. Peoples Drug Store, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Franceschina v. HopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Pine Street Trading Corp. v. Farrell Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. McLhinney v. Lansdell Corp. of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Raitt v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API