Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 17, 2018No. Case No.: 15cv578–WQH–AGSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, Judge:
The matter before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration or, in the alternative, Certification for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) filed by Defendants Monsanto Company, Solutia Inc., and Pharmacia Corporation. (ECF No. 175).
I. BACKGROUND
On March 13, 2015, Plaintiffs San Diego Unified Port District (the "Port District") and City of San Diego (the "City") commenced this action by filing the Complaint. (ECF No. 1). On August 3, 2015, the City and the Port District filed separate First Amended Complaints ("FACs") against Defendants Monsanto Company, Solutia…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Robin James, a Married Person in Her Separate Capacity v. Price Stern Sloan, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Penguin Putnam, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Javier Noriega-Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Charles Demore Lori ScialabbaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hilliard v. Twin Falls County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
- Johnson v. Canyon County, IdahoDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
- Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky v. WasdenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024