Whitaker v. Beach
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Leavenworth district court. The notice given by the sheriff of the time and place of sale-was sufficient, as the words of the statute are answered *by one publication inserted in a newspaper thirty days before the day of sale. Code, § 457; Craig v. Fox, 16 Ohio, 564; Gwynne,. Sheriffs, 300; Andrews v. Ohio & M. B. B. Co., 14 Ind. 170.
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
On the twenty-sixth of April, 1873, the plaintiff in-error purchased at sheriff’s sale 80 acres of land in Leavenworth county, which was sold in pursuance of a decree of foreclosure previously rendered by the district court of said county. An order of sale was issued on said decree to the sheriff, who caused the property to be advertised for sale; the advertisement being published in the Leavenworth Weekly Times four consecutive weeks, to-wit, on the twentieth and twenty-seventh days of March, and on the third and tenth days of April. The proceedings of the sheriff are fully set out in his…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Lawson v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Johnson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co., Ltd. v. BiggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Bancroft Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914