Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 4, 1931No. 14125PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The conviction was for violating the provisions of article 1370, Penal Code, making it an offense to knowingly permit cattle, etc., to run at large in territory where the stock law had been adopted. The punishment was assessed at a fine of $101.
An election was held in Harris county on Saturday, May 24, 1930, *573for the purpose of determining whether the stock law should become operative throughout the entire county. After a canvass of the returns had disclosed that a majority had voted for the adoption of the law, the county judge duly issued his proclamation declaring the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Early v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Leach v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Dever v. CornwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Finlayson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Lawson v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Turner v. LewieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Shrader v. RitcheyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Sanford v. Commissioners' Court, Grayson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Shrader v. RitcheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Collins v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.