Legal Opinion
United States v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1977No. 74 Civ. 3121PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERCE, District Judge.
This is an action commenced by the United States as plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345. Plaintiff alleges that the defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Edison”) entered into an oral agreement with the plaintiff to reimburse the Atomic Energy Commission (“AEC”) for costs incurred in the summer of 1970 by reason of a release of 200 megawatts of electrical power. The power was released to Con Edison by the AEC in the midst of a New York City area power crisis resulting from the July 21, 1970 failure of Con Edison’s Ravenswood…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Bradkin v. LevertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Esquire Radio & Electronics, Inc. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. KriegerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Hoffmann v. BooneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- City of El Centro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.