Legal Opinion

Greene v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 29, 1966No. Civ. A. No. C 63-975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM K. THOMAS, District Judge.

Under Rule 34 the defendant moves for an order requiring the plaintiff to produce and to permit inspection and copying of “ALL records, including statements and reports” of doctors who have examined and treated the plaintiff at different times.

The matter has been considered upon the pleadings, defendant’s motion, written briefs of the parties, and also upon oral statements of counsel made at the pretrial hearing.

To the extent that the records sought may deal with the plaintiff’s claim of a herniated intervertebral disc and aggravated arthritis of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sher v. De HavenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  2. Clark v. Vega Wholesale Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1998
  3. Sagmiller v. CarlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Phipps v. SasserWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hughes v. GrovesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API