Legal Opinion

United States v. Armstrong

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 6, 2002No. CGCMG 0120; Docket No. 1076Published

1Opinion of the Court

KILROY, Judge:

On 29 September 1999, this Court reviewed Appellant’s general court-martial in which he pled guilty to some offenses pursuant to a pretrial agreement, and not guilty to others, with guilty findings resulting from both types of pleas.1 The Court found implied-bias error with respect to a court member, and set aside the sentence and the guilty findings that were not based on pleas of guilty. The findings resulting from guilty *748pleas were determined to be not affected by the error and were affirmed.2 The record was returned for a rehearing on the findings and sentence, with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. BedaniaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. AlbertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API