Legal Opinion

Palmer for Use v. Heath

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1934No. Appeal 31PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant, Heath, from the decree of the court discharging a rule to show cause why defendant should not be permitted to set off against the judgment entered in the above entitled case, certain judgments held by said Heath against R. E. Palmer, legal plaintiff.

The judgment in said case was entered on August 16, 1932, on a certain note under seal containing warrant of attorney authorizing confession of judgment, executed by C. H. Heath and dated November 7, 1930, calling for the payment of $375 six months after date. The note was assigned and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Henniss v. PageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. Moore v. EisamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Snyder v. Southwestern National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Leitz v. HohmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roxborough Trust Company's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API