Moore v. Eisaman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 33, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Westmoreland Co., May T., 1899, No. 378, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of John A. Moore and Joseph 0. Moore, trading as John A. Moore & Bro., v. J. R. Eisaman. Assumpsit upon an alleged contract of guaranty. Before Doty, P. J. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in refusing to fake off nonsuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Mestbezat,
B. F. Long contracted with the borough of Braddock in Allegheny county to pave certain streets of that borough with fire brick. Long entered into a written agreement with John A. Moore & Brother, the appellants, to furnish him the brick for this purpose. The agreement is dated July 1, 1890, and its terms required the brick to be delivered in Braddock by October 1, of the same year. After the execution of the agreement by the parties, Long took it to J. R. Eisaman, the appellee, and he wrote at the end thereof, “ O. K. J. R. Eisaman.” The brick were furnished by…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. v. LampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Bayard v. Pennsylvania Knitting Mills Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Paturzo v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Martin-Nelly Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.