Legal Opinion
United States v. Oregon
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 16, 1992No. Civ. No. 68-513-MAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION1
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff-intervenor Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (“Colville”) filed a complaint in intervention seeking injunc-tive relief and a declaration that it is the successor in interest to the Wenatchi, Enti-at, Chelan, Columbia, Palus and the Chief Joseph Band of Nez Perce Indians, and as such, it is entitled to exercise Columbia River off-reservation fishing rights reserved by those tribes in the Treaty at the Walla Walla Valley on June 9, 1855, 12 Stat. 951, II Kapp. 698, ratified March 8, 1859 (“Yakima Treaty”) and the Treaty at Walla…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. State of Or.District Court, D. Oregon · 1992
- Con Tribes Colville v. Con Tribes YakamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Grondal v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020