Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1983No. 20-567a; 81-5453a; CA A22122PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order granting defendant’s motion to suppress all evidence obtained by the state through the interception of all telephone calls to and from defendant’s telephone during a period of about six weeks. The trial court found that the state had made no effort to minimize the interception of communications not otherwise subject to interception, ORS 133.724(4) and (5); 1 its order suppressed the tape recordings of all 958 telephone calls intercepted. We affirm.

Early in the morning of December 14, 1980, defendant’s husband, Christopher Lee Tucker, was found dead at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. FocarileDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  4. United States v. LaGorgaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. United States v. LetaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PottleOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. State v. PottleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API