Legal Opinion
United States v. Leta
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 11, 1971No. Crim. 14849PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
Defendant Louis Ciancutti has moved to suppress wiretap evidence obtained by the United States government in its investigation of defendant Leta’s alleged gambling activities. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is denied.
On May 1, 1970, the Honorable William J. Nealon of this court signed an Order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518 authorizing the interception of wire communications over two private telephones, one in the home of defendant Leta and one frequently used by Leta in a glass shop owned by another. Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Elvin Lee BynumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. FocarileDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- United States v. John Jacob BoboCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.