State v. Tucker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.
Defendant appeals her conviction for murder, ORS 163.115, assigning 18 errors. We reverse.
Defendant was indicted, together with Craig Pottle, for the December 14,1980, murder of her estranged husband. In a pretrial appeal by the state, we affirmed the suppression of all evidence which the state obtained through wiretaps of calls made to and from defendant’s telephone during a six-week period after the homicide. The wiretaps were not obtained in accordance with ORS 133.724, which authorizes wiretaps under certain circumstances, and they were suppressed pursuant to ORS 133.735 and ORS 165.540.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. PottleOregon Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Kassab v. Michigan Basic Property InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.