Legal Opinion

Birkenheuer v. Birkenheuer

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided March 19, 1945No. 30Published

1Opinion of the Court

Keller, P. J.,

— On June 19, 1939, libellant, a native of Hungary and alien resident of the United States since’ 1913, instituted this action in divorce against his wife, Magdolna Birkenheuer, whose *91last known residence was Temesvar, formerly a part of Hungary but now, since World War I, a part of Roumania, on the ground of desertion which is alleged to have occurred while libellant and respondent were residents of Temesvar. The sheriff having made a return of “non est inventus” as to the original subpoena, an alias subpoena was issued on August 3,1943, and, subsequently, on September 11,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Fort v. Brighton Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. City Nat. Bank of Selma v. Dresdner Bank of BremenDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1919
  5. Kintner v. Hoch-Frequenz-Maschinen Aktien-Gesellschaft fur Drahtlose TelegraphieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API