Legal Opinion

Fort v. Brighton Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 19, 1926No. 11,226PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Brighton Ditch Company sued Fort for damages to its irrigating ditch, caused by the breakage of a dam in defendant’s reservoir, and recovered judgment. Defendant brings error. We shall designate the parties as in the trial court.

Plaintiff owns a ditch taking water from the South Platte river. Todd creek crosses the ditch about seven-tenths of a mile below plaintiff’s headgate. Defendant’s reservoir is on Todd creek, about 1,000 feet above the intersection of the creek with the ditch.

After a period of heavy rains, the dam of the reservoir broke, the water burst out, carrying part of the dam,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Big Five Mining Co. v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Colorado Bridge & Construction Co. v. PreuitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Ryan Gulch Reservoir Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Beaver Water & Irrigation Co. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Weld County Bd. of County Com'rs v. SlovekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. A to Z Rental, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Comfort Homes, Inc. v. PetersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Taylor v. Colorado State Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Zwick v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API