Landgraver v. DeShazer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
Plaintiffs sought specific performance of a contract to exchange their motel' for defendants’ ranch; The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to the third amended complaint upon the ground that the contract was so indefinite and uncertain that equity would not enforce it. Plaintiffs did not plead further and a decree was entered for defendants.
The complaint alleged that “plaintiffs entered into a written contract with the defendants for the exchange *448of the aforesaid real property * * *. That copy of the written contract, marked ‘Exhibit'A’, is attached hereto and made a part hereof * *
Th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Contract Co. v. Bullen Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Holtz v. OldsOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Gaines v. VandecarOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Mannix v. the Portland TelegramOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Bonnevier v. Dairy Cooperative Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Dale's Service Company, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Landgraver v. DeShazerOregon Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.