Wilmore Coal Co. v. Holsopple
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 37, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from- decree of O. P. Somerset Co., Equity Docket, 1912, No. 16, dismissing bill in equity in case of The Wilmore Coal Company v. Russel Holsopple. Bill in equity lor an injunction. Before Stephens, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court dismissed the hill. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were the action of the court on exceptions and the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Brown,
This hill was for an injunction to restrain the appellee from cutting trees on lands belonging to the appellant, in Paint Township, Somerset County, known as the Murdock tract. The following material facts, found on sufficient evidence by the learned judge below, specially presiding, led to the dismissal of the bill.' Russel Holsopple, the appellee, in the year 1900, was the owner of certain standing timber on a tract of land containing fifteen acres, known as the James P. Thomas tract, situated at Mine No. 39, of the Berwind-White Coal Mining Company. That…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Washburn's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Appeal of RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartman v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McCafferty v. McCafferty, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County1922