Strutwear Knitting Co. v. Olson
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Per curiam
The case has not become moot. The withdrawal of the troops for failtxre of the mayor to assume full responsibility for their conduct is no recognition of the rights of the plaintiff which are here sought to be vindicated, nor is there any assurance that the acts complained of will not be repeated if an injunction is denied or the case dismissed. See F. Burkart Mfg. Co. v. Case et al. (C.C.A.8) 39 F.(2d) 5; Mobile Gas Co. v. Patterson et al. (D.C.) 288 F. 890; State v. Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Co., 115 Minn. 116, 131 N.W. 1075; Oklahoma Operating Company v. Love et al., 252 U.S. 331, 40 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
- Faubus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Aaron v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Faubus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Wilson & Co. v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.