State v. McMillan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
The defendant appeals from his conviction of second degree rape contending that the trial court (1) erroneously permitted Mrs. Buie, an incompetent witness, to testify; (2) allowed into evidence, for corroborative purposes, a prior statement of Mrs. Buie which included prejudicial material not testified to by Mrs. Buie; (3) failed to instruct the jury properly on the limited use of the “corroborating” statement; and (4) erred in its jury charge on second degree rape.
I
First, the defendant argues that his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was denied when the trial court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Sparks v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004